APHC010019862021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1438/2021 Between: 1. SYED MEER, S/O. SHAIK KHALEEL SAHEB, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC SCRAP COLLECTION, R/O.22-13-79/1B, AMBEDKAR COLONY, AUTONAGAR, TIRUPATI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE UPD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. SRI SUBBA REDDY, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE 0/0. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UPD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SRI SHAIKSA VALI, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALIPIRI POLICE STATION, ALIPIRI, TIRUPATI. 6. SRI PALEM SAIPRASAD, C.I. OF POLICE, BUKKARAYASAMUDRAM, ANANTAPURAMU. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 3 in not enquiring into the atrocities committed towards the petitioner coupled 2 with financial activities of the Respondents No. 4 to 6 pursuant to Representation dated 21.11.2020 as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, non- est besides violation of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 2 to 3 to order an enquiry on the allegations against the Respondents No. 4 to 6 pursuant to complaint dated 21.11.2020 by a competent agency forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 3 to give protection to the life and liberty of the Petitioner in the hands of the Respondents No.4 to 6 forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. RAVULA NAGARJUNA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1438 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 3 in not enquiring into the atrocities committed towards the petitioner coupled with financial activities of the Respondents No.4 to 6 pursuant to Representation dated 21.11.2020 as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, non-est besides violation of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 3 to order an enquiry on the allegations against the Respondents No.4 to 6 pursuant to complaint dated 21.11.2020 by a competent agency forthwith …” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court vide Order dated 21.01.2021, the respondent- police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondents. 3. Sri Srinivasulu Kurra, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of making the interim order as absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.10.2025. VNS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 1438 of 2021 Dated.07.10.2025 VNS 711