Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53511 (KAR)

T M MUSAVEEIR S/O T M KHALEEL v. BTM INVESTMENTS PVT LTD R/BY SRINIVAS S/O VISHNURAO MANE

CRL.P/102649/2025 · 2025-07-14

Venkatesh Naik T

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8673 CRL.P No. 102649 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102649 OF 2025 (482 OF Cr.PC/528 OF BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. T. M. MUSAVEEIR S/O. T. M. KHALEEL, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. NO.25, EX SERVICEMAN COLONY, R. T. NAGAR, BANGALORE (NORTH)-560032. 2. N. M. NOORAHMED S/O. N. M. NABI, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.589, WARD NO.13, RAMNAGAR, NEAR JAMIYA MASJIDI, KUDLIGI-583135, BELLARI DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRASHANT MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE) AND: BTM INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD., R/BY SRINIVAS S/O. VISHNURAO MANE, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. NO.4, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, GOKUL ROAD HUBBALLI-580030, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD. …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. (UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PETITIONERS/ A1 AND A2 IN C.C. NO.1094/2022 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST JMFC COURT HUBBALLI FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NI ACT, AT VIDE ANNEXURE-C, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8673 CRL.P No. 102649 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal of the criminal petition. Memo which is placed on record reads as under: “The counsel for Petitioner submits as under: The petitioner filed memo as per instruction given by the Petitioners office objections were raised there was already a petition is pending on behalf of the same Petitioners. The same was not informed to the petitioner counsel at the time of filling petition Hence, it is most humbly and respectfully request this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the petition as not pressed. In the interest of justice and equity. Hence this Memo.” In view of the memo, the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE AC /CT-AN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9