IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 CRWP-4557-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.05.2025. Simarjit Kaur ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Kachura, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. (Oral) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Articles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 4 to protect the life and personal liberty of the petitioner and her family members at the hands of respondents No.5 to 9. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that no case has been registered against the petitioner. She is not involved in FIR No.104 dated 15.04.2025, under Sections 351, 137(2), 87, 61(2) of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar (Rural), but she is being harassed by the police by calling her at the Police Station though she is not that person who had been named in the aforesaid FIR. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he would be satisfied if the representation dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-3), which had already been moved before respondent No.3 is looked into. KOMAL 2025.05.05 17:03 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRWP-4557-2025 (O&M) -2- Notice of motion. Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice and submitted that he has not objection if the aforesaid representation dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) is looked into. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3—Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar (Rural), to look into the representation dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) and to take appropriate action, if any required at the earliest. Disposed of. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 05.05.2025. Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.05.05 17:03 I attest to the accuracy of this document