Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53508 (AP)

Smt.Kommineni Durgamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/8003/2019 · 2025-12-08

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010185802019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8003/2019 Between: 1. SMT.KOMMINENI DURGAMMA, W/O. LATE VEERAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD R/O. REDDIGUDEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, REDDYGUDEM, REDDYGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. KONDAPALLI KONDALA RAO, S/O. RAMA KOTAIAH, AGED 49 YEARS R/O. REDDYGUDEM, REDDYGUDEM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. KONDAPALLI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. KONDALA RAO, AGED 30 YEARS R/O. REDDYGUDEM, REDDYGUDEM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent not providing Police Protection against the 2 unofficial Respondents in connection with causes trespasses the petitioner land and damaged the Roof Shed and made theft valuable property 1 the petitioner and - threatening the petitioner with anti social elements and endanger to the petitioner life and limb in respect of the land RS no. 404/11 to an extent of Ac.0.11 cents situated at Reddygudem Village and Mandal, Krishna District and violating the Hon'ble High Court Stay Order in CRP 5193 of 2018 by the Respondents No.4 is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 19 anc 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent Police to provide Police Protection in favour of the petitioner herein with his own costs and expenditure against the respondent Nas.4 and 5 in respect of the land in question IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to provide police protection infavour of the petitioner against the respondent Nos.4 and 5 in respect of the land RS no. 404/11 to an extent of Ac.0.11 cents situated at Reddygudem Village and Mandal, Krishna District immediately, with her own costs and expenditure for protection pending disposal of the main writ petition, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KONDAPALLI SYAM SUNDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8003 of 2019 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner appearing virtually, and Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to avail alternative remedies available in law. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the proper forum for necessary redressal in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 9th December, 2025 cbn 4 54 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8003 of 2019 9th December, 2025 cbn