Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53503 (AP)

VEERABALLI PRATGHAP v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/29522/2023 · 2025-12-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010569852023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29522/2023 Between: 1. VEERABALLI PRATGHAP, , S/O VENKATA RAMANA, HINDU HARIJANA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, LAW GRADUATE, R/O.NULIVEEDU HARIJANAWADA, GAALIVEEDU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT (NOWANNAMAYYA DISTRICT), ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , HOME DEPARTMENT, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRATARY, A.P.SECRATRIATE, VELAGAPUDI, GUMTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT (NOW ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT), REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, GAALIVEEDU POLICE STATION, GAALIVEEDU MANDAL , YSR KADAPA DISTRICT (NOW ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT). ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the inaction of the 2nd respondent did not take any action on my Complaint dated on 24-10-2023 in is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violate of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to conduct pair invistigation on my complaint dated 24-10-2023 and take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased my complaint dated 24-10-2023 with another Police Station with in the District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVI KIRAN KUMAR KOLUSU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29522/2023 The Court made the following: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the inaction of the 2nd respondent did not take any action on my Complaint dated on 24-10-2023 in is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violate of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to conduct pair investigation on my complaint dated 24-10-2023 and take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent and pass such order or orders…” 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.12.2025 Ksj