Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5350 (UTT)

DR. PALLAVI PATNI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/529/2017 · 2025-03-17

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:1785-DB WPSB No.323 of 2017 With WPSB No.529 of 2017 WPSB No.569 of 2017 Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Mr. Dinesh Gahatori, learned counsels, for the petitioners. 2. Mr. P.S. Bisht, learned Addl. CSC, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. N.S. Adhikari, learned counsel, holding brief of Mr. Ramji Shrivastava, learned counsel, for the Uttarakhand Medical Services Selection Board. 4. Mr. Mohd. Umar, learned counsel, for the respondent nos.4 to 9 & 11 to 23. 5. Uttarakhand Medical Services Selection Board invited applications for appointment to the post of Dental Surgeon in Medical Education Department, and petitioners also submitted their applications. Petitioner’s contend that selection process got vitiated due to certain anomalies, therefore the entire process be quashed. 6. Today when the cases are called out, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that since selection process is over long back and there was no interim order granted in favour of the petitioners, therefore, the writ petitions have become infructuous by efflux of time. Learned counsel for the respondents also make similar statement. 7. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 17.03.2025 NR/