Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53498 (AP)

K.PRABHAKAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14250/2023 · 2025-12-29

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010253972023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14250/2023 Between: 1. K.PRABHAKAR REDDY, S/O. LATE BATHI REDDY, AGED BOUT 67YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR R/ O KANNADU VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATH RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECREYARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR' DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPAT' (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DWAMA CHTOOR DISTRICT,PRESENTLY T'RUPATI TIRUPATI DISTRICT 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, , PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, DPO OFFICE AT COLLECTORATE BUILDINGS, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PR-DIVISION,RWS AND S DEPARTMENT, TIRUPATI DIVISION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 2 6. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT 7. THE PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, PATHAVEERAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYATH, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No. 2,5 and 6 in payable to me under MNREGS and SCSP (SC-Sub Plan) as illegal, arbitrar9,, unconstitutional and contrary to the. A.P Panchayath Raj Act, ans,,4 consequently direct the respondents No. 2 TO 7 to take necessary action in ranting payments of Rs. 7,57,754/- payable to the petitioner for executing the work I.e., CONSTRUCTION OF CC ROAD AT HARIJANAWADA WATER TANK TO GOVINDH SETTY HOUSE T PATHA VEERAPURAM GP IN YERPEDU MANDAL IN WORK ID No.107A61316018080066 underMGNREGS Scheme vide Agreement No. /2020-21, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2,5 and 6 to take necessary action in granting payments of Rs. 7,57,754/-payable to the petitioner as balance amount work executed under MNREGS for the CONSTUCTION OF CC ROAD AT HARIJANAWADA WATER TANK TO GOVINDH SETTY HOUSE T PATHA VEERAPURAM GP IN MGNREGS Scheme vide Agreement No. /2020-21, under MGNREGS pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable court, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM 3 PANCHAYAT 2. GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following: ORDER: Aggrieved by non-payment of bill amounts to the petitioner for Construction of CC Road at Harijanawada Water Tank to Govindh Setty House T Patha Veerapuram Gram Panchayat in Yerpedu Mandal, under MGNREGS scheme, the present writ petition is filed. 2. On 01.12.2025, there is no representation for the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents reported that the amount claimed by the petitioner in this writ petition had already been paid to the petitioner. 4. Recording the said submission, as the amount has already been paid to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. However, if the petitioner still feels that the cause survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 30th December, 2025 RKS