IN THE HIGH 125 Surinder Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. directed to release the retiral benefits i.e. gratuity, leave encashment, PF etc., regarding which has been submitted, instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 2. merits of the case, this p the respondents to decide the P-6, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and rea manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Surinder Kaur Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. A.P.Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel would contend that the respondents be directed to release the retiral benefits i.e. gratuity, leave encashment, PF etc., regarding which a representation dated 17.02.2025, Annexure P has been submitted, which has yet not evoked any respo instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 17.02.2025, Annexure within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and rea manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12854-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 07.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel would contend that the respondents be directed to release the retiral benefits i.e. gratuity, leave encashment, PF a representation dated 17.02.2025, Annexure P-6, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel In view of the above and without commenting upon the etition is hereby disposed of with a direction to representation dated 17.02.2025, Annexure within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if etition is hereby disposed of with a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.08 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-12854-2025 -2- found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 07.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.08 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.