Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53491 (PAT)

Rajdev yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./44110/2025 · 2025-07-16

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44110 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2025 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Rajdev yadav Son of Latye Mahavir Yadav village- Kendua, Ps- Fatehpur, dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 16-07-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a senior citizen aged about 71 years and from perusal of the allegation, as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assault is against Ashok and petitioner along with Kamlesh are also alleged to have assaulted the informant. It is also submitted that on account of dispute relating to property a panchayati was convened, in which the alleged occurrence is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44110 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 said to have taken place on 15.02.2025. It is next submitted that the date of occurrence is 15.02.2025 and the FIR came to be instituted on 03.03.2025 i.e. after a delay of 18 days and that too based on a written application of the informant. It is thus submitted that had the informant been assaulted in the manner as alleged in that event the fardbeyan of the informant would have been recorded at the hospital. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No.145/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T