Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5349 (CHH)

MALTI v. JAY PRATAP

WP227/114/2024 · 2025-02-24

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9351 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 89 of 2024 Malti D/o Late Rambilas, W/o Ramdas Aged About 50 Years Caste Maar R/o Village Jatro, Post, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. Jay Pratap S/o Late Rambilas, Aged About 45 Years Caste Maar R/o Village Bhanaura, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh At Present R/o Nagar Ambikapur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 2. Maheshwar Singh S/o Late Rambilas, Aged About 47 Years Caste Maar R/o Village Bhanaura, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 3. Mohanlal S/o Radheshyam, Aged About 35 Years Caste Maar, R/o Village Mahrajganj, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 4. Geeta Singh W/o Mohan Lal Aged About 34 Years Caste Maar, R/o Village Mahrajganj, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 5. Girwar Singh S/o Late Shivbarat, Aged About 70 Years Caste Maar, R/o Village Dahejwar, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 6. Manoj Kumar Gupta S/o Ramlagan Gupta, Aged About 44 Years Caste Teli, R/o Village Balrampur, Post, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 7. Yuvraj Kurre, The Then Deputy Registrar And Ex- Officio Tahsildar, Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh R/o Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.02.24 16:05:15 +0530 2 Nagar, Ramanujganj, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 8. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) WITH WP227 No. 114 of 2024 Malti D/o Late Rambilas, W/o Ramdas Aged About 50 Years Caste- Marar, R/o Village Jatro, Post, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Jay Pratap S/o Late Rambilas Aged About 45 Years Caste- Marar, R/o Village Bhanaura, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., At Present Resident Of Nagar Ambikapur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2. Maheshwar Singh S/o Late Rambilas Aged About 47 Years Caste- Maar, R/o Village Bhanaura, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 3. Mohanlal S/o Radheshyam Aged About 35 Years Caste- Maar, R/o Village Mahrajganj, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 4. Geeta Singh W/o Mohan Lal Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Mahrajganj, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 5. Girwar Singh S/o Late Shivbarat Aged About 70 Years Caste- Maar, R/o Village Dahejwar, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 6. Manoj Kumar Gupta S/o Ramlagan Gupta Aged About 44 Years Caste- Teli, R/o Village Balrampur, Post, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 7. Yuvraj Kurre The Then Deputy Registrar And Ex-Officio Tahsildar, Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. R/o Nagar Ramanujganj, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 3 8. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. T. R. Chandrakar, Advocate For State : Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, P.L. For Respondents No. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 : Mr. Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 24/02/2025 1) Heard on I.A. No. 2, which are applications for withdrawal of writ petition in both matters. 2) On due consideration, applications are allowed. 3) Consequently, both petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate applications before the Courts below. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya