Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53484 (AP)

Gonthina Varaha Narasimha Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

WP/24962/2018 · 2025-10-12

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010529382018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24962/2018 Between: 1. GONTHINA VARAHA NARASIMHA NAIDU, S/O. APPA RAO, 40 YRS., R/O. PEDAGANTYADA VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER:- The writ petition was filed aggrieved by the interference of the respondent authorities in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the property. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for GVMC, upon written instructions, submits that the land under occupation of the petitioner is listed under Section 22-A of the Prohibited Land Register of Pedagantyada Mandal and that the respondent Corporation has not interfered with the possession of the petitioner at any point of time and that any further action by the Corporation shall follow the due process of law. 3. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. [ 4. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 13.10.2025 PNS