Kallam Subba Reddy, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/34248/2025 · 2025-12-29
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53476 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53476 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010647012025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 34248/2025 Between:
1. KALLAM SUBBA REDDY,, S/O. K RADHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. 3-111, YSR CENTRE, KALLAM VEERA REDDY STREET, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RWS AND S DIVISION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RWS AND S SUB-DIVISION, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other
appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents not releasing the amount of Rs.4,22,793/-, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., Construction of CC drain from Vemula Nageswara Rao (H) to Nannam Chennakesavulu (H) in Nandivelugu (V) of Tenali (M) (RWS- 5078 - 8352), vide Agreement No. / 2023-24, dated 11.12.2023 is questioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to pay for payment of amounts of Rs.4,22,793/- with interest @24percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
ORDER
The Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent authorities in not releasing Rs.4,22,793/- even after finalizing the bills in relation to the works of Construction of C.C.Drain from Vemula Nageswara Rao House to Nannam Chennakesavulu Hosuein Nandivelugu Vilalge of Tenali Rural Mandal.
3. Ms. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader, by placing on record the written instructions of the Executive Engineer, RWS &S Division, Guntur submitted that the authorities admitted balance amount due to the petitioner of Rs.4,22,793/- and prayed to grant eight (08) weeks time to the authorities to pay the amount to the petitioner.
4. Ms.D.Madhavi, learned counsel, for Smt. Modapothula Sumalatha,
learned counsel for the petitioner, reported no objection for granting time as sought for by the learned Assistant Government Pleader.
5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the authorities concerned to pay to the petitioner the admitted amount of Rs.4,22,793/- within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the amount. The petitioner is at liberty to agitate his claim regarding interest before a competent civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Dated 30th day of December, 2025.
RR