Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 53473 (BOM)
NEHA D/O ANIL AGRE v. INDUSIND BANK PUNE THR. AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND OTHERS
WP/927/2022 · 2025-06-16
Shri Ravindra Madhusudan Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53473 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53473 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 wp 927.22.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.927/2022 Ku. Neha V Indusind Bank and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.C. Reddy, Advocate h/f Mr. S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.S. Motwani, Advocate for respondent no.3.
CORAM : R.M. Joshi
, J.
DATE : 16-06-2025.
Learned Counsel for both the sides make a statement that parties have setttled the dispute amicably and nothing survives in the petition. Hence, Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. (R.M. Joshi
, J. ) Deshmukh