APHC010088832012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 40318/2012 Between: 1. SRI. CH. V.S.V. GOPALA RAO,, S/O VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS LECTURER IN ECONOMICS, RAJAH R.S.R.K. RANGA RAO COLLEGE, BOBBILLI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD 3. THE SECRETARY / CORRESPONDENT, RAJAH R.S.R.K. RANGA RAO COLLEGE, BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring in issue of the Memo No.8896/CE.II.1/2010-1, dated 12.12.2012 issued by the 1st respondent is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional consequently direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as a Lecturer in Economics against aided vacancy in the 3rd respondent College from the date of petitioner's initial appointment with all consequential benefits such as seniority and salary etc., IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 51152 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service as Lecturer in Economics against the aided vacancy in the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. KURITI BHASKARA RAO The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 14.11.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.11.2025 TVN 57 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.40318 OF 2012 Date: 22.11.2025 TVN