P MOUNIKA PRIYADARSHINI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/12708/2021 · 2025-11-23
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53465 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53465 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010223542021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12708/2021 Between:
1. P MOUNIKA PRIYADARSHINI, D/O. P.BABU RAO,@MOHD.
GHOUSE MOHIUDDIN, C/O.JASMINE RANI,AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MHR PVT. LTD., R/O. HANUMAN JUNCTION, KS TALKIES ROAD, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521105.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, HANUMAN JUNCTION POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HANUMAN JUNCTION POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction or order, more
2
particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of Respondents 5 and 6 in not receiving and registering the complaint of the petitioner dated 14-01-2021, 26/27-01-2021, 31-05-2021 inspite of the representation forwarded to the respondents 3 and 4 as contemplated under Section 154(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and not giving protection to the petitioner in the hands of the accused in the complaint as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and whimsical, and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to register the F.I.R and investigate into the complaint of the petitioner in the interest of Justice and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P A SESHU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ ... to issue an appropriate Writ or direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of Respondents 5 and 6 in not receiving and registering the complaint of the petitioner dated 14-01-2021, 26/27-01-2021, 31-05-2021 in spite of the representation forwarded to the respondents 3 and 4 as contemplated under Section 154(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and not giving protection to the petitioner in the hands of the accused in the complaint as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and whimsical, and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to register the F.I.R and investigate into the complaint of the petitioner in the interest of Justice and pass ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that Petitioner’s mother (respondent No.5) filed written report dated 31.5.2021 before the Police, against her husband and son.Petitioner also gave complaint against her father and brother. Basing on the petitioner’s mother’s report, a case in Crime No.238 of 2021 is registered and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh