PRABAKAR S/O VASADEV NAIK v. SHRI BASAVESHWAR SAHAKARI BANK NIYAMIT BAGALKOT
WP/106206/2024 · 2025-09-26
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53464 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53464 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13580 WP No. 106206 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 106206 OF 2024 (CS-DAS) BETWEEN:
PRABAKAR S/O. VASADEV NAIK AGE 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. GANESH GALLI, TQ. RAIBAG, DIST. BELAGAVI 591113. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SHRI BASAVESHWAR SAHAKARI BANK NIYAMIT BAGALKOT, R/BY BRANCH 587101.
2.
SHRI BASAVESHWAR SAHAKARI BANK NIYAMIT BAGALKOT R/BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER 587101.
3.
SHRI BASAVESHWAR SAHAKAR BANK NIYAMIT BAGALKOT R/BY IT SALE OFFICER 587101.
4.
JOINT REGISTER OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY (441) REGIONAL OFFICER NO, I, 9/10 DOLLORS COLONY, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI 580030.
5.
ASSISTANT REGISTER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY (441) AND RECOVER OFFICER REGIONAL OFFICER NO, I, 9/10 DOLLORS COLONY, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI 580030. …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13580 WP No. 106206 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO,WHEREFORE, THE PETITIONER MOST RESPECTFULLY PRAYS THAT THIS COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO GRANT THE FOLLOWING RELIEFS TO THE PETITIONER AS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION OR ORDER AND SET ASIDE THE AUCTION NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.05 DATED 01/8/2024 WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE A AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER AS THIS TRIBUNAL DEEMS FIT IN THE
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND ALLOW THE ABOVE APPEAL WITH COSTS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 09.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE gab CT: CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 62