IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42793 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2023 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== 1. Himanshu Tiwari Son of Late Ashok Tiwari Resident of village- Banarpur Akhauripur Gola, PS- Buxar Muffasil, District- Buxar 2. Dilip Kumar Singh Son of Late Bachan Singh @ Late Lalabachan Singh Resident of village- Banarpur Akhauripur Gola, PS- Buxar Muffasil, District- Buxar 3. Abhay Kumar Singh @ Tantu Singh Son of Vijay Singh Resident of village- Banarpur Akhauripur Gola, PS- Buxar Muffasil, District- Buxar 4. Narendra Tiwari Son of Late chandradeep Tiwari Resident of village- Banarpur Akhauripur Gola, PS- Buxar Muffasil, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 04-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 435, 436, 427, 353 and 153 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution story, in short, is that about 100- 150 accused persons armed with lathi and danda came at the gate of informant’s company and started raising slogans. It is alleged that they entered in the campus of Power Plant and set the vehicle, Guard Room etc. on fire. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42793 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that the FIR has been registered against unknown persons and names of these petitioners transpired during course of investigation. 5. However, learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that petitioner nos. 1 & 2 have got two criminal antecedents, petitioner no. 3 has got three and petitioner no. 4 has got nine criminal antecedents. 6. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal antecedents, prayer for bail of the petitioners is refused. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T