APHC010250272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1709/2025 Between: 1. NANDIPALLE VENKATA RAMANA, S/O N ESWARAIAH AGED 45 YEARS OCC VOA, R/O D NO 168, GORLAGUTTA VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 2. MUTHYALA MUNNAIAH,, S/O M LAKSHMAIAH, AGE 38 YEARS, OCC VOA, R/O SAI DHARANI BETHAMCHERLA, BETHAMCHERAL MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. SURYAPOGULA YELLAIAH,, S/O GIDDAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC VOA, R/O D NO 31601, SEETHARAMAPRUAM VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. MANDIA HYMAVATHI,, W/O RAMANJANEYULU, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC VOA, R/O D NO 733, CEMENT NAGAR, BUGGANIPALLI VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLA MANDLAL NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. C V NAGASANKAR,, S/O CHINNA VENKATA GARI SUBBAIAH, AGED 39 YEARS, OCC VOA, R/O 2136, MUDDAVARAM VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 6. CHALLA LALITHA, W/O CHALLA SAHADEVUDU, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC VOA, R/O 623 H, KOTTALA VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 7. KUMMARI VIJAYASANTHI,, W/O K MADDILETI SWAMY, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC VOA, R/O D NO 46, KUMMARI STREET, R S RANGAPURAM VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL, NANDYAT DISTRICT 8. BELLAM ADILAKSHMI,, W/O BELLAM LAKSHMI KANTH REDDY, AGE 31 YEARS, OCC VOA, R/O D NO 2122, HUSENAPURAM VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI MADHU SUDHARSAN GOUD, THE ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 2. G RAMAKRISHNA, THE CLUSTER COORDINATORS, KOLUMULAPALLE VIJETHA, SRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SANKALAPURAM, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL NANDYAL DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents/Contemnors herein for his willful violation and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 29940 of 2024 dated 20.12.2024 under sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with certified copy in WP No. 29940 of 2024 dated 20.12.2024 on the file of this Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Nandipalle Venkatesh Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. . 2. HARI BABU MAGULURI SC For SERP The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case has been filed, complaining of the violation of the order dated 20.12.2024, passed in W.P.No.29940 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. The petitioners filed the aforementioned writ petition complaining about the action of respondents 5 & 6 in not allowing them to discharge their duties as Village Organization Assistants in their respective societies. 4. The said writ petition was disposed of on 20.12.2024, directing the aforementioned respondents not to interfere with the petitioners’ discharge of duties as VOAs of their respective societies. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleaded that the respondent authorities have violated the order dated 20.12.2024. 6. A counter-affidavit has been filed by respondent No.1. Along with the counter-affidavit, resolutions passed by the respective societies have been annexed. A perusal of the resolutions would indicate that by the resolution dated 30.10.2024, one Smt. N. Anitha was elected as the new VOA in the place of the 1st petitioner; by resolution dated 15.12.2024, one Smt. V. Sirisha was elected as the new VOA in the place of the 2nd petitioner; by resolution dated 28.10.2024, one Smt. G. Sivalakshmi was elected as a new VOA in the place of the 3rd petitioner; by resolution dated 15.04.2025, one Smt. K. Vijaya Lakshmi was elected as a new VOA in the place of the 4th petitioner; by resolution dated 10.01.2025, one Smt. Madiga nakkali Jyothi, was elected as a new VOA in the place of the 5th petitioner; by resolution dated 24.10.2024, one Smt. C. Radha was elected new VOA in the place of the 6th petitioner; by resolution dated 21.12.2024, one Smt. A. Rathna Kumari was elected as a new VOA in the place of the 7th petitioner, and by resolution dated 15.12.2024, one Smt. B. Pranitha was elected as a new VOA in the place of the 8th petitioner. 7. Thus, as seen from the resolutions annexed with the counter-affidavit, the petitioners were replaced with the new incumbents as VOAs. Thus, the contention of the petitioners that the respondents are interfering with their discharge of duties is misplaced. Hence, this Court does not find any violation of the order dated 20.12.2024, passed in W.P.No.29940 of 2024, and the contempt case is liable to be dismissed. 8. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 28.11.2025 TVN 443 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.1709 OF 2025 Date: 28.11.2025 TVN