Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010542442025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28185/2025 Between:
1. B SIVA KUMAR, S/O. LATE. B. GANGULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,
R/O. RAMPALLE VILLAGE, BHEEMAGANIPALLE PANCHAYATH,
PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. B NEELIMMA, W/O. LATE. P. VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC POSTAL EMPLOYEE R/O. VIDYA NAGAR, NEAR MSR THEATER, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. KODANDA RAMAIAH, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC RETIRED VRO R/O. D.NO. 2-309, G1 SV COLONY II, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the
2
inaction on the part of the respondents No. 4 and 5 in registering a crime one on the complaint, dated, 18-08-2025 submitted by petitioner as arbitrary. Illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast upon them, colorable exercise of power and voilative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.4 and 5 to register basing on the complaint, dated 18-08-2025 given by petitioner.”
2. Heard Ms.S.Parineeta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that since the matter is purely civil in nature, the police have not registered any crime on the representation of the petitioner. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 ASR
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.28185 of 2025
Dt.14.10.2025
Asr