LINGAMAPLLI GOURAMMA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/33964/2025 · 2025-12-08
Nyapathy Vijay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53426 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53426 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010658582025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 33964/2025 Between:
1. LINGAMAPLLI GOURAMMA, W/O. LINGAMPALLI MALLIKARJUNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEAR, R/O.1/112-1, HALALHARVI VILLAGE, HALAHARVI MANDALAM, HALAHARVI, PO. HALA KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518348
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, SAMAGRA SIKHSHA ABHYAN, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, PATAMATA,
VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
3. THE ADDITIONAL PROJECT COORDINATOR, SAMAGRA SIKSHA ABHYAN, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
5. THE PRINCIPAL, KASTURBA GANDHI BALIKALA VIDYALAYAM (K.G.B.V), HALAHARVI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the
2 High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no 5 in not allowing the writ petitioner in performing her duties as watchman in 5th respondent school without any orders of suspension or termination as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 to 5 to continue my services in the 5th respondent school as watchman and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the 5th respondent to continue the writ petitioner as watchman in the 5th respondent school by paying the salaries, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J.JYOTHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KALAMATA RAGHU BABU
2. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following:
3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.33964 of 2025
ORDER : This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 5th Respondent-School in not allowing the Petitioner in performing her duties as Watchman without any order of suspension or termination as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The Petitioner was appointed in 2007 as Watchman in the 5th Respondent-School and has been working as such till October,
2025. However, the services of the Petitioner were discontinued.
3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner was informed that the discontinuation was on account of the Petitioner attaining the age of 60 years but the same is incorrect as the age of the Petitioner is 55 years. It is stated that the age of the Petitioner is supported by Aadhar Card and Pan Card of the Petitioner. Learned counsel for the Petitioner filed a letter dated 13.11.2025 issued by Principal, KGBV School, Halaharvi Village, Kurnool Mandal stating that the age of the Petitioner, on verification of the documents, is 23.07.1970 and has been wrongly entered in APCOS LOGIN as 26.10.1965.
4
4. Learned standing counsel for Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 5 Sri K.Raghubabu submits that the services of the Petitioner were discontinued as the Petitioner had attained the age of 60 years as per the records maintained by them.
5. In the light of the submissions made, the writ petition is
disposed of with the following directions: (i) The Respondents are directed to take a decision regarding the age of the Petitioner in the light of the letter dated 13.11.2025 issued by Respondent No.5-Principal, KGBV School, Halaharvi Village, Kurnool Mandal and the documents enclosed, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. (ii) In the event the age of the Petitioner is held as claimed by the Petitioner, the Petitioner shall be continued as Watchman in the Respondent No.5-School, till she attains the age of 60 years. (iii) No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 09.12.2025 KLP