APHC010733972012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 39046/2012 Between: 1. D.JAGADEESWARA RAO, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGE: 44YRS OCC: ADDL. ASST. ENGINEER/O/PODUR /BHEEMAVARAM DIV., APEPDCL R/O PODUR, WEST GODAVARI DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR CORPORATE OFFICE, P&T COLONY, SEETHAMMADARA, VISAKHAPATNAM 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE: ELURU, APEPDCL ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the lst o Respondent in issuing Memo No. FIRD/MPS/MPP/F.1255/08/D.No.999/12/Dt.15-12-2012 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 49548 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Addl Asst. Engineers by suspending Memo No. HRD/MP S/MPP/F .1255/08/D .No .999/12/Dt.15- 12- 2012, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 472 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed on dated 19-12-2012 In W.P.MP.NO.49548 OF 2012 IN W.P.No.39046 of 2012 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M V RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO 3. . The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Ms. Iswarya, learned counsel representing Sri V.V. Satish, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, would submit that the petitioner was allowed to continue in service and, in fact, the petitioner was promoted to the cadre of Assistant Engineer. 2. Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 31.10.2025 & 14.11.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 3. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.11.2025 TVN 69 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.39046 OF 2012 Date: 22.11.2025 TVN