Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53421 (AP)

Dr.R. v. .R. Krishna Prasad Vs Union of India,

WP/40053/2014 · 2025-11-04

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010197082014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 40053/2014 Between: 1. DR.R.VS.R. KRISHNA PRASAD, S/O NAGESWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER R/O ACIRTYA MANAIR, HAT NO.204, GANDHIPURAM-II, RAJAHMUNDRY-III, E.G.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT. NEW DELHI. 2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGTION, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, PLOT NO. 5-B, 6TH FLOOR, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110003 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION HYDERABAD ZONE, 3RD FLOOR, KENDRIYA SADAN, SULTAN BAZAR, KOTI, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the 341 respondent in taking action on the petitioner's complaint dt. 1-11-2014 submitting for conducting thorough probe into the illegal and corruptive activities of the managements of the Private Medical Colleges in Andhra 2 JS,J W.P.No.40053/2014 Pradesh and Telangana State as being, illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 50235 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent authorities to conduct through probe pursuant to the complaint dt.01.11.2014, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMIDI SATHYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P VIJAYA KUMARI 2. P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI 3 JS,J W.P.No.40053/2014 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. Though the matter was listed on 17.09.2025, 24.09.2025 and 24.10.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Perused the record. Since the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.11.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.40053/2014 254 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 40053/2014 Dated: 05.11.2025 KAS