Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53412 (PNJ)

RANI DEVI v. SH GAURAV YADAV, IPS, & ANR

COCP/2244/2025 · 2025-07-31

Sudeepti Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

306 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2244-2025 Date of decision: 31.07.2025 RANI DEVI ..Petitioner Versus GAURAV YADAV, IPS, & ANR ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Animesh Sharma, Addl. A.G, Punjab. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of order dated 09.01.2025 passed by this Court in CWP-148-2025. 2. Learned State counsel contends that as per the compliance report dated 01.07.2025, filed by Gaurav Toora, IPS, Senior Superintendent of Police, District Kapurthala, order dated 09.01.2025 has been complied with. This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The relevant para 3 of the compliance report dated 09.01.2025, is reproduced as under:- “3. That the following service benefits have been paid to Smt. Rani and Ms. Smaira in equal share: a. Ex. Gratia Grand amount Rs. 1,00,000/-paid on 25.11.24. b. GIS Insurance amount Rs. 60,000/- paid on 20.09.24. c. GIS Saving Rs. 12,226/- paid on 20.09.24. MOHD AYUB 2025.08.01 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2244-2025 -2- d. HDFC Death Insurance Claim Rs.2,50,000/- paid on 26.08.24 e. GPF final payment Rs 4,77,186/- paid on 18.06.25. f. Leave encashment Rs 1,19,424/- paid on 18.06.25.” 4. In view of the above, the present contempt is purged and rule is discharged. July 31st, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.08.01 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.