APHC010657372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12642/2025 Between: 1. AVVARI VEERA PRASAD, S/O. ANNAPPA, AGED. 37 YEARS, OCC.VETERINARY DOCTOR, R/O. FLAT NO. 502, G-7 HEIGHTS, NEAR INDIAN BANK, KUNCHANAPALLI, TADEPALLI PO, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522501 ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT AMARAVATI. 2. KOTHAKONDA CHAYA VINAYA DEVI, W/O. AWARI VEERA PRASAD D/O. KOTHAKONDA VENKAT RAO, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC. VETERINARY DOCTOR, R/O. DR.NO.1-158, NEAR WATER TANK, CHERUVUKATTA BAZAAR, PIDUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522413. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. KARRI RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. VINEELA BADUGU 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused, seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.652 of 2025 of Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District registered for the offences under Sections 85 and 118(1) of BNS. 2 2. I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are filed by Respondent No.2 seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise between her and the Petitioner/Accused. 3. Petitioner/Accused and Respondent No.2 appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. 4. Both parties would submit that they came to an amicable settlement for withdrawal of the case in Crime No.652 of 2025 of Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District pending between them. Respondent No.2 submits that, she is not interested to prosecute the matter and that they compromised the matter and hence, the case may be closed. 5. Considering the submissions, in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another1, since there is an amicable settlement between them, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the case against the Petitioner / Accused in Crime No.652 of 2025 of Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District, is hereby quashed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.12.2025 Asr 1 2012(10)SCC 303 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No. 12642 of 2025 Dt.09.12.2025 Asr