APHC010756102016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32001/2016 Between: 1. VUMMADI ANIL KUMAR REDDY,, S/O.RAMASUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 3/201-1A, SAIKUTEER ROAD, PRODDATUR - 516360, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION, REP.BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYATH NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHIEF PLANT MANAGER, IOCL, LPG BOTTLING PLANT, KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent in not allowing the petitioner's trucks into the premises of the respondent at Kadapa Bottling plant and engaging the petitioner's own workmen for the purpose of loading and unloading the LPG cylinders during the subsistence of the Transportation Contract awarded pursuant to the Tender Notification No.APSO/LPG-O/PT-05/2013-14, as illegal and arbitrary IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 39574 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents to immediately permit the trucks of the petitioners along with the workmen into the premises of the respondent at Kadapa Bottling plant by issuing Gate Passes, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 7th October, 2025 cbn 4 702 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.32001 of 2016 7th October, 2025 cbn