Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 534 (MEG)

SOPIKUL ISLAM v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS

MC(WPC)/30/2025 · 2025-02-26

W Diengdoh

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Serial No. 07 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC[WP(C)] No. 30 of 2025 in WP(C) No. 471 of 2018 Date of Decision: 26.02.2025 Shri. Sopikul Islam son of Abdus Sobur Sk, Resident of Boalia, P.O Radha Madhab Hat, P.S Mankachar, District South Salmara, Mankachar, Assam. ……Petitioner - Vs- 1. State of Meghalaya represented by the Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Meghalaya. 2. The Director of School Education & Literacy, Meghalaya, Shillong. 3. The District School Education Officer, West Garo Hills, Tura, Meghalaya. 4. The Principal, Garodubi Higher Secondary School, P.O Haripur, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 5. The Secretary, Managing Committee, Garodubi Higher Secondary School, P.O Haripur, P.S Phulbari, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 6. Shri. Mokibur Rahman, Assistant Lecturer 2025:MLHC:111 2 C/o Garodubi Higher Secondary School, P.O Haripur, P.S Phulbari, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …….Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S.A. Sheikh, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG with Mr. H. Abraham, GA. Ms. Z.E. Nongkynrih, GA. for R 1-3. Ms. M. Hajong, Adv. vice Mr. H.L. Shangreiso, Sr. Adv. for R 4 & 5. Mr. R. Debnath, Adv. for R 6. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. S.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on prayer made and on being directed by this Court, another respondent has been impleaded in these proceedings. However, since the petitioner would seek specific relief against the newly impleaded respondent, therefore, the petition has to be suitably amended to incorporate such prayer. To this extent, prayer is made for amendment of the writ petition. 2. This Court on consideration of the submission made, is in 2025:MLHC:111 3 agreement with the learned counsel for the petitioner and therefore, will allow the prayer made so as to enable the petitioner to amend the instant writ petition. 3. Accordingly, this Misc. Case is disposed of. Judge 2025:MLHC:111 Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2025.02.26 19:51:33 IST