APHC010066912021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3889/2021 Between: 1. JEERU RAMANAMMA, W/O. LAKSHMANARAO AGED 26 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE R/O.P.KNAYUDUPETA, KOYYAM PANCHAYAT, YETCHARLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELLAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ETCHARLA POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER, M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. JEERU RAMA RAO, S/O. APPAIAH AGED 58 YEARS, OCC- REAL ESTATE BUSINESS R/O. KOTHAKURMINAIDU PETA, ETCHARLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3889 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 to 4 in not providing police security in Koyyam Grampanchayat, Srikakulam District in order to Protect the petitioner and to safeguard the law and order while petitioner is conducting election campaign is illegal , arbitrary and violation of constitutional right of contesting elections and to consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to provide police security in Koyyam Grampanchayat, Srikakulam District in order to protect the petitioner and to safeguard the law and order in Koyyam Grampanchayat till the completion of panchayat elections and to pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 15.10.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.3889 of 2021 Dated.15.10.2025 UPS 54