Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53393 (DEL)

HARPREET KAUR v. HARMAN KOUR SHARMA

CS(OS)/248/2024 · 2025-10-17

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 248/2024 HARPREET KAUR .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Mr. Mandeep Singh, Ms. Drishti Jain and Ms. Mridula Vats, Advocates. versus HARMAN KOUR SHARMA .....Defendant Through: In person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 15.04.2026 I.A. 8377/2026 (under Section 151 CPC by the plaintiff) 1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff/applicant seeking following reliefs: “a). issue directions to Decree Branch / registry of this Hon’ble Court to expedite the task of preparing and issuing the decree sheet to the applicant / plaintiff herein, enabling her to sell the captioned flat and to pay the sale proceeds of the same to the non-applicant / defendant; b). issue directions to the SBI, branch at Sansad Marg, New Delhi, to release the entire amount lying till the date of release, in PPF account bearing no. 33431198698 in the name of Lt G S Sharma deceased father of the applicant / plaintiff to the applicant / plaintiff, enabling her to honor the said settlement agreement and judgment and decree vide dated 17.10.2025 of this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. c). to kindly extend the time for further three months, commencing from the date of issuance of decree sheet to the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 15:06:55 applicant / plaintiff, enabling her to make the entire balance settlement amount of Rs. 1.02 Crore to the non applicant/defendant.” 2. Insofar as relief sought in clause (a) of the prayer is concerned, the Registry was directed vide order dated 30.03.2026 to place on record a report with regard to the preparation of decree. Pursuant thereto, the decree sheet has been placed on record by the Registry. 3. In that view of the matter, Mr. Sanjeev Soni, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff/applicant submits that said prayer (a) stands satisfied. 4. He submits that suit was decreed by this Court in terms of settlement agreement dated 18.09.025, which was arrived at between the parties before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. He contends that in terms of the said settlement plaintiff has to pay full and final settlement amount of Rs.1.28 Cr. to the defendant, out of which an amount of Rs.26 Lacs has already been paid, the receipt of which is acknowledged by the defendant, who has joined through VC. 5. The parties are ad idem that the remaining amount to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant is Rs.1.02 Cr. Mr. Soni submits that the said balance amount will be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant within a period of one month from today. The statement is taken on record and the plaintiff is bound down to the same. 6. He further submits that all other amounts which are lying in various accounts of late father of the applicant namely, Sh. Gurcharan Singh has to go to the plaintiff/applicant. He submits that all amounts have already been released by the Bank to the plaintiff except the amount lying deposited in the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 15:06:55 form of PPF account no. 33431198698 maintained with State Bank of India, Sansad Marg, New Delhi. 7. He submits that the amount lying in the said account is to the tune of Rs.6,16,580/- as on 22.12.2025 as per the letter issued by the Bank. He urges the Court that necessary direction needs to be given to the Bank. He submits that even as per the settlement, the entire amount lying in various accounts is payable to the plaintiff, which position is not disputed by the defendant. 8. In view of the above, State Bank of India, Sansad Marg Branch is directed to release the amount lying in the PPF account no. 33431198698 in the name of Late Gurcharan Singh Sharma, deceased father of the plaintiff/applicant, to the plaintiff/applicant, within a period of two weeks from today along with interest accrued thereon. 9. Application stands disposed of. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J APRIL 15, 2026/jg This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 15:06:55