Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53390 (KAR)

SHRI SHIVANAND PARAPPA VANDAL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/106951/2024 · 2025-04-22

C M Poonacha, S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6737-DB WP No. 106951 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO.106951 OF 2024 (S-KAT) BETWEEN: SHRI SHIVANANDA PARAPPA VANDAL AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. ASSISTANT TEACHER (PCM), (EDUCATION COORDINATOR) GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, R/O. BHIMANAGADA, TQ. HUNGUND, DIST. BAGALKOT 587202. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOURABH HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION & LITERACY, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTOR, BANGALORE DISTRICT, BAGALKOTE 587101. 3. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER HUNAGUND, TQ. HUNAGUND, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587118. 4. SIDDANAGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA PATIL AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. ASSISTANT TEACHER (PCM), EDUCATION COORDINATOR, BEO OFFICE, HUNAGUND-587118, R/O. ILAKAL, TQ. ILAKAL 587125, DIST. BAGALKOTE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. SHIVAKUMAR BADAWADGI, ADVOCATE FOR R4) MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6737-DB WP No. 106951 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY SETTING ASIDE IMPUGNED ORDER OF KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BELAGAVI BENCH IN APPLICATION NO.10923/2024 DATED 24-10-2024 VIDE ANNEXURE- B & ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo dated 22.04.2025 signed by both learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the petitioner, seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition with a prayer to direct respondents No.1 to 3 to consider the representation dated 28.3.2025. Memo is placed on record. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, respondents No.1 to 3 are directed to consider the representation dated 28.3.2025 and redress the grievance of the petitioner, if any. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE JTR CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 50