1 2025:CGHC:60135 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1892 of 2023 Laxmi Shankar Soni S/o Shri Babu Lal Soni Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Kosmandi, Post Kosmandi, Tahsil - Palari District - Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh through its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Education Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate of Public Instruction, Department of School Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Block - C, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For State/Respondents : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 10.12.2025 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition even in two rounds. 2. Mr. Devesh G. Kela, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State, is present. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.12.10 17:48:26 +0530 2 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayers:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to call for the entire records of the case for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction and be pleased to direct the respondent authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction and be pleased to direct the respondent authority to appoint the petitioner as Assistant Teacher or Contractual Teacher as per his experience. 10.4 That, any other relief(s) which the Hon'ble Court deems fit & proper may kindly be pleased to granted in favour of the petitioners;” 4. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter, as such this Court has left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh