[2025:RJ-JP:21367] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1461/2025 Shubham Narayan @ Prince S/o Shri Mukesh Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Barnawa Bagpath, Police Station Binoli, Distt. Bagpath, Uttar Pradesh At Present Residing Shakti Khand - 3, Plot No. 8, Sf-2, Indrapuram, Police Station Indirapuram, Distt. Gajiyabad, Uttar Pradesh. (Presently In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1921/2025 Anand @ Abhishek S/o Shri Bhishm Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Beeta Post And Police Station Incholi, Distt. Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, At Present R/o Shakti Khand- 3, 373 F-1, Police Station Indirapuram, Distt. Gajiyabad, Uttar Pradesh. (Presently In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anita Aggarwal For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG Mr. Tarun Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.7/2024 registered at Police Station- Cyber Police Thana (Sawai Madhopur), District-Sawai Madhopur [2025:RJ-JP:21367] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1461/2025] for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 2. The prosecution story in short is that concerning bank manager has released amount of Rs.14,57,000/- in favour of Kripa Four Wheeler Pvt. Ltd. on the basis of mobile call received by him. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. Counsel further submits that the petitioners are mere an instrument in the alleged offence. No amount has been transferred in their bank accounts and they have not made any phone call to any one or forged any document. They have no active participation in the alleged offence. The allegations against them is that they have passed over bank account indirectly to various co-accused. In fact, petitioners are not aware about alleged crime and they have acted bonafidely. Counsel further submits that there are no criminal case registered against them. Charge-sheet has been filed. Petitioners are behind the bars since 12.01.2025 and no recovery has been made from the petitioners. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant [2025:RJ-JP:21367] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1461/2025] have vehemently opposed the bail applications and submitted that looking to the gravity of case, petitioners are not entitled for bail. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially that there is no allegation against the petitioner about calling on phone and no amount has been transferred in their bank and no allegation exists about forging any document but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Shubham Narayan @ Prince S/o Shri Mukesh Kumar and Anand @ Abhishek S/o Shri Bhishm Singh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/51 & 53