Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53379 (KAR)

SHRI. SANJIV S/O VENKATRAO RAYAR v. SMT. SHRUTI W/O SANJAY RAYAR D/O SUBHASH DIKSHIT

WP/101608/2025 · 2025-08-21

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10591 WP No. 101608 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.101608 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SHRI SANJIV S/O. VENKATRAO RAYAR, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE WORK, R/O. NEAR SHRI VITHAL RUKMINI TEMPLE, AZAD NAGAR, DANDELI, TQ. DANDELI, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH M. KHARVI, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SHRUTI W/O SANJAY RAYAR, D/O. SUBHAS DIKSHIT, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. SHRI. SHANKARACHARYA MATH, TOWNSHIP, DANDELI, TQ. DANDELI, U.K. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) ISSUE AN ORDER OR DIRECTION OR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED. 31-08-2024 ON IA NO.1 IN M.C.NO.26/2023 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL AT HALIYAL UTTAR KANNADA. VIDE ANNEXURE-A.B) ISSUE SUCH OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTIONS AS THIS HON BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PRESENT CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10591 WP No. 101608 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) Issue an Order or Direction or Writ in the Nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned order dated. 31-08-2024 on IA No.1 in M.C.No.26/2023 passed by the Hon’ble Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Haliyal at Haliyal Uttar Kannada. vide Annexure-A. b) Issue such other suitable writ or order or directions as this Hon’ble court deems fit under the circumstances of the present case in the interest of justice and equity. 2. A memo dated 21.08.2025 singed by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has been filed, which reads as under; “Herein, the advocate for petitioner respectfully prays and submits as under: That the above petition, the petitioner and respondent made settlement in the Trial Court. Therefore petition become infructous. Now the petitioner want to withdraw the petition. Hence Hon’ble Court kindly permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition as not pressed in interest of justice and equity.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10591 WP No. 101608 of 2025 3. Accepting the said memo and submission of the counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of disposal of the writ petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AM CT:PA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 109