Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53376 (CHH)

SUNIL KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12816/2025 · 2025-11-11

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:55171 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12816 of 2025 1 - Sunil Kumar Verma S/o Late Johan Lal Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Neurgaon, Block Bolda, District - Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Collector Collectorate Office District - Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) 5 - The District Education Officer And Secretary Under District Rationalization Committee District - Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) 6 - The Block Education Officer Bolda, District - Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For petitioner : Mr. Siddhant Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 12.11.2025 1. The petitioner has filed present petition assailing the order dated 04.06.2025 whereby he has been declared surplus and also order dated KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Digitally signed by KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Date: 2025.11.13 18:48:14 +0530 2 03.11.2025 and 18.07.2025 by which his representation has been rejected. 2. From bare perusal of the order dated 03.11.2025 passed by the Divisional Rationalization Committee, it is quite vivid that the strength of the school is 67 students, as such, one headmaster and three teachers are required to be posted, therefore, one headmaster who belongs to Arts Subject and one-one teacher belonging to Maths, English, Science subject have been posted. The petitioner being junior and belonging to Maths subject has been declared surplus. As such, I am of the view that no anomaly has been committed by the respondents in declaring the petitioner as surplus which warrants interference by this Court. 3. According, the writ petition sans merits and it is dismissed. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge kishore