COCP-1888 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217+103 Dr. Nidhi Bhardwaj Sh. TL Satya Parkash CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. alleging violation of order dated co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP Bhardwaj follows:- 2. compliance of the direction reproduced above, case of the petitioner was considered and she ha (Horticulture), vide order dated 1888-2024 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Dr. Nidhi Bhardwaj Versus Sh. TL Satya Parkash CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner violation of order dated 12.01.2024 (Annexure P ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP- vs. State of Haryana and others “5. Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate has caused behalf of respondent Nos.2 & 3 and submitted that since the order dated 16.12.2023 passed in CWP (Annexure P-20) wherein it was so directed that status quo would remain in force for a period of four weeks which would end on 15.01.2024, the respondent Nos.2 & 3 will thereafter re-visit the order (Annexure P promotion order of petitioner was withdrawn and by way of fresh application of mind will pass a fresh order after re visiting the same and strictly in accordance Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance of the direction reproduced above, case of the petitioner was considered and she had been promoted to the post of Executive Engineer (Horticulture), vide order dated 23.10.2023. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1888-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.08.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA . Arvind Seth, Advocate for the respondent. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner 12.01.2024 (Annexure P-1), passed by a -767-2024 titled as ‘Dr. Nidhi and others’, whereby it is directed as Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate has caused appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.2 & 3 and submitted that since the order dated 16.12.2023 passed in CWP-19961-2021 20) wherein it was so directed that status quo would remain in force for a period of four weeks which 024, the respondent Nos.2 & 3 will visit the order (Annexure P-19) by which the promotion order of petitioner was withdrawn and by way of fresh application of mind will pass a fresh order after re- visiting the same and strictly in accordance with law.” Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance of the direction reproduced above, case of the petitioner was been promoted to the post of Executive Engineer 23.10.2023. Learned counsel for the The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner 1), passed by a Dr. Nidhi whereby it is directed as appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.2 & 3 and submitted that since the 2021 20) wherein it was so directed that status quo would remain in force for a period of four weeks which 024, the respondent Nos.2 & 3 will 19) by which the promotion order of petitioner was withdrawn and by way of Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance of the direction reproduced above, case of the petitioner was been promoted to the post of Executive Engineer Learned counsel for the RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.29 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1888 respondent submits that thus, the order dated 12.01.2024 (Annexure P stands duly complied with and nothing survives in the present petition. 3. by learned counsel for t 4. the case having been called twice. As such, the instant petition is disposed of in the absence of learned counsel petitioner. 5. passed in the present petition 6. 7. 28.08.2025 rishu 1888-2024 (O&M) -2- respondent submits that thus, the order dated 12.01.2024 (Annexure P stands duly complied with and nothing survives in the present petition. A copy of the order dated 23.10.2023 by learned counsel for the respondent is taken on record. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the case having been called twice. As such, the instant petition is disposed of in the absence of learned counsel petitioner. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same stands Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable respondent submits that thus, the order dated 12.01.2024 (Annexure P-1) stands duly complied with and nothing survives in the present petition. 23.10.2023, handed over in Court taken on record. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the case having been called twice. As such, the instant petition is disposed of in the absence of learned counsel petitioner. o further orders are required to be stands disposed of, accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 1) , handed over in Court There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the case having been called twice. As such, the instant petition is disposed o further orders are required to be RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.29 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.