1 2025:CGHC:56422 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7959 of 2023 Sanjay Kumar Patel S/o Lakheshwer Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Kotmi Sonar, P.S. Akaltara, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Health Director Raipur Chhattisgarh, Department Of Health And Family Welfare Government Of Chhattisgarh, Sector 19 North Block, Atal Nagar Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Community Action Through Motivation Programme CAMP, Address- HIG 1/676, Sector-29, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 19.11.2025 1 None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition even in two rounds. 2 Mr. Devesh G. Kela, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State, is present. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.11.19 19:04:50 +0530 2 3 The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayers:- “10.1 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authorities to consider the said post EMT Emergency Mdical Technicial of all chhattisgarh employee should not be removed on the basis of the petitioner's experience and should be re-appointed to the said post and further directed the respondents to issue reappointment orders in favour of petitioner. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate direction/order to respondent to allow the petitioner to continue as said post EMT. 10.4 That, any other relief which the Hon'ble Court may deemed fit and proper also be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 4 Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter, as such this Court has left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 5 Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh