Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53374 (AP)

Bodapati Rajeswaramma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/1520/2021 · 2025-10-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010021322021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1520/2021 Between: 1. BODAPATI RAJESWARAMMA, W/O.VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/O.D.NO.8-163/A, KAKATIYANAGAR, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AADHAAR NO.317785956022. 2. BODAPATI VENKATA RAO,, S/O.VENKATERSWARULU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/O.D.NO.8-163/A, KAKATIYANAGAR, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AADHAAR NO.807362860755. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, CHILAKALAPUDI, MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KRISHNA, MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , NANDIGAMA CIRCLE, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , NANDIGAMA POLICE STATION, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1520 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents in taking action on the complaint dated 28-12-2020 and also fail to give protection to the Petitioners as well as their property under the provisions of The Maintenance of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007 and Rules 2011 there under as arbitrary, illegal and violative of right to property under Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the complaint of the petitioners forthwith and pass….” 2. None represented for the petitioners. 3. Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit basing on the complaint given by the petitioners dated 28.12.2020, after conducting preliminary enquiry, a case in Crime No.91 of 2021 under Sections 448, 506, 427 r/w 34 IPC has been registered on the file of Nandigama Police Station, Krishna District. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.10.2025. Vns