256 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRR-4099-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.03.2025 DR. SUNIL DHUSSA AND ANOTHER …Petitioners V/S KRISHAN KUMAR …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Gehlawat, Advocate for Mr. Komal Mor, Advocate for the respondent. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. This revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 24.10.2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak vide which judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.06.2014 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Rohtak have been upheld. 2. Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners today. It appears that neither the petitioners nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. 3. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution accordingly. 4. Pending CRM(s), if any, are also disposed of accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) 24.03.2025 JUDGE Ajay Goswami Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.03.25 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document