$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR.P.(C.) 28/2025 SAKSHI PUNSHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Advocate. versus RADHESH GULATI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prateek Goswami, Mr. Shashank Goswami and Ms. Shreya Goswami, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 13.07.2026 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are ad idem that, in terms of the settlement arrived at between them, the present Petition was to be withdrawn upon institution of the first motion. 2. In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties stand settled, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present Petition pending. 3. The present Petition is, accordingly, disposed of, with liberty to the parties to seek revival thereof in the event of non-compliance with the terms of settlement. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. JULY 13, 2026/nd/dj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2026 at 11:49:52