Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53367 (CHH)

SHABID KHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8194/2023 · 2025-10-15

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:51784 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8194 of 2023 Shabid Khan S/o Shri Piru Khan Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Lokhandi, P.S. Sakri, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Executive Officer C.G. Infotech Promotion Society (CHIPS), 3rd Floor, State Data Center Building, Opp. New Circuit House, Civil Lines, Raipur- 492001 Chhattisgarh. 3 - Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - Nodal Officer District E-Governance Society, Office Of Collector, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh 6 - Rohit Singh Thakur S/o Shri Purushottam Singh R/o Pathak Bihi Bagicha, Jobrapara, New Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Mahima Chandra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Arham Siddiqui, Advocate For State : Mr. Ajay Pandey, G.A. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.10.16 18:21:26 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 16.10.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash/set-aside the impugned final list dated 05-10-2023 (Annexure P-1) & advertisement dated 21-09-2023 (Annexure P-2). 10.2 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to issue fresh advertisement and provide reasonable opportunity to the participate in the recruitment process. 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to grant such other relief(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice and fair play.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State having no objection. 4. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh