Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53362 (PNJ)

SANDEEP KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CWP/12813/2025 · 2025-05-20

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-12813-2025 -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12813-2025 Date of Decision:-20.05.2025 SANDEEP KUMAR GUPTA … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondents -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present:- Mr. Sardavinder Goyal, Advocate (through Video Conferencing) and Mr. Nishant Sindhu, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SUDHIR SINGH J .(Oral) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the official respondents to ensure supply of minimum mandated amount of potable water to the house of petitioner and other residents situated in Sector- 14P, Hisar, round the year, without having usage of electrical motor/pump by him. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made a representation dated 16.03.2025 (Annexure P-5) to the competent authority for redressal of his grievances, but no action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioner would be GAURAV SOROT 2025.05.26 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12813-2025 -:2:- satisfied, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with his concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said application. 3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State, whereas Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.2-HSVP and submits that the said representation shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 (competent authority), to look into the pending representation dated 16.03.2025 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH ) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) 20.05.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2025.05.26 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document