Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5336 (UTT)

NIPUL ALIAS CHOTA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/798/2023 · 2025-03-25

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 25.03.2025 BA1 No. 798 of 2023 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Ms. Chetna Latwal, Advocate for the compliant. 4. Learned State counsel submitted that the applicant has confessed his crime, as such, the bail application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 5. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 25.03.2025 Kaushal