[2025:RJ-JP:11720] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2056/2025 Sohan Lal S/o Shri Puran Mal Jangir, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 9/824 Malviya Nagar Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Department Of Agriculture Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Deputy Secretary, Department Of Personal (A-3/inquiry) Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner, Agriculture Department, Government Of Rajasthan Panth Krishi Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Marg, Behind High Court, Jaipur. 4. Commissioner, Water Shed Development And Soil Conservation, Government Of Rajasthan, Panth Krishi Conservation, Government Of Rajasthan, Panth Krishi Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Marg, Behind High Court Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/03/2025 1. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that before approaching this Court, the petitioner had submitted a detailed representation before the respondents in the light of the circular dated 30.08.2017, issued by the Department of Personnel for redressal of his grievances. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said representation of the petitioner has not been decided by the [2025:RJ-JP:11720] (2 of 2) [CW-2056/2025] respondents till date, for the reasons best known to them. Counsel submits that a direction be issued to the respondents to decide the same. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts of this case and looking to the fact that this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 on 02.02.2024 had issued general directions to all the departments of the State that whenever any representation is submitted by any aggrieved person, the concerned department would look into the matter and decide the same as early as possible. 5. In the light of the directions issued in the case of Pawan Meena (supra), the instant writ petition stands disposed of with directions to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/ order to the respondents to decide the representation in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 7. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /45