Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53358 (AP)

M/s. Valency International Pte Ltd, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13749/2021 · 2025-10-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010222772021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13749/2021 Between: 1. M/S. VALENCY INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD,, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR. SAURRAV SHARMA, S/O. SRI SITARAM SHARMA, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 10, ANSON ROAD, 18-26 INTERNATIONAL PLAZA, SINGAPORE - 079903 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VIJAYAWADA. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SP, SPSR, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KRISHNAPATNAM PORT POLICE STATION, KRISHNAPATNAM, NELLORE DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ more particularly in the, nature of Writ )f Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not- taking any action on the complaint of the Petitioner dated 25.09.2020 which was sent by Registered 2 post Ack Due to the 4th Respondent through RPAD vide postal receipt no. Rl 659289147 IN. which was delivered to the 4th Respondent. The same was sent to the 2nd Respondent onvide Postal receipt No. RI 659289120 IN which was delivered and the 3rd Respondent on 09.10.2020 vide postal receipt No. RI 659289005 IN which was delivered as arbitrary, illegal and in Violation of Articles 14,19,21 of Constitution Of India and also in violation of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in 2014(12) SCC 1 in Lalitha Kumari Vs State of U.P and consequently direct the respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 25.08.2020 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to register the complaint of the Petitioner dated 25.09.2020 which was sent by Registered post Ack Due to the 4th Respondent through RPAD vide postal receipt no. RI 659289147 IN. which was delivered to the 4th Respondent. The same was sent to the 2nd Respondent onvide Postal receipt No. RI 659289120 IN which was delivered and the 3rd Respondent on 09.10.2020 vide postal receipt No. RI 659289005 IN which was delivered forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEEPAK MISRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13749 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ more particularly in the, nature of Writ )f Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not- taking any action on the complaint of the Petitioner dated 25.09.2020 which was sent by Registered post Ack Due to the 4th Respondent through RPAD vide postal receipt no. Rl 659289147 IN. which was delivered to the 4th Respondent. The same was sent to the 2nd Respondent onvide Postal receipt No. RI 659289120 IN which was delivered and the 3rd Respondent on 09.10.2020 vide postal receipt No. RI 659289005 IN which was delivered as arbitrary, illegal and in Violation of Articles 14,19,21 of Constitution Of India and also in violation of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in 2014(12) SCC 1 in Lalitha Kumari Vs State of U.P and consequently direct the respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 25.08.2020 and pass.…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.10.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13749 of 2021 Dated.06.10.2025 UPS 11