SMT. VIDHYA GUPTA W/O LATE SHRI HARISH CHANDRA GUPTA v. SHRI NAVEEN JAIN
CCP/122/2024 · 2025-02-04
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5335 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5335 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4846-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.122/2024 In D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.663/2015
1. Smt. Vidhya Gupta W/o Late Shri Harish Chandra Gupta, Aged About 74 Years, Resident Of 53, Lav Kush Nagar-Ii, Barkat Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur.
2. Babu Lal Sharma S/o Shri Kalyan Prasad Sharma, Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of B-9, J.p. Colony, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur-302015. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Shri Naveen Jain, Ias, Principal Secretary To The Government Of Rajasthan, Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Shri Kana Ram Director, Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. Shri Rajendra Kumar Sharma, District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Shiksha Sankul, Jaipur (Deosec.jaipur1@gmail.com).
4. Shri S.s. Bothra, Secretary, S.s. Jain Subodh Shiksha Samittee, Ram Bagh Circle, Jaipur.
5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Government Of Rajasthan, Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harsh Vardhan Nandwana, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG, with Mr. Hardik Singh, Adv. Mr. Tarun Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Adv., with Mr. Aditya Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Ankul Gupta, Adv.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 04/02/2025 A statement is made by the learned counsel for the respondents and the affidavit filed showing compliance that the petitioners have been paid amount as per computation.
[2025:RJ-JP:4846-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-122/2024] This contempt petition is closed however, with the liberty to the petitioners to take appropriate remedy in case the computation is not acceptable. Rule is discharged.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ F.R. Bohra & Danish/41