1 2025:CGHC:60001 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 10158 of 2025  Ravikumar S/o Ashok Pal Aged About 19 Years R/o Village - Torfa, Chowki - Balangi, Police Station - Raghunathnagar, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus  State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House O昀케cer, Police Chowki - Balangi, Police Station - Raghunathnagar, District - Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh --Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Arun Kumar Shukla, Advocate. For-Non-applicant : Ms. Pragya Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Vema, Judge Order on Board 10/12/2025 1. This is the 昀椀rst bail application 昀椀led under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 100/2024 registered at Police Station Chowki Balangi Police Station Raghunathnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.), for the o昀昀ence punishable under Sections 137(2), 103(1), 238, 140(2), 61(2) of the BNS. 2. The allegation against the present applicant as per the prosecution case is that, on 02.10.2024 the complainant Ramashok Pal lodged report at Police Chowki Balangi regarding missing of his son Brijesh Pal. During course of investigation, the dead body of Brijesh Pal was recovered from Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.12.16 18:56:24 +0530 2 the forest side. The dead body was sent for postmortem of the report. The memorandum statement applicant was recorded and on the basis of his memorandum, the aforesaid o昀昀ences have been registered against the applicant and his brother Vikas Pal. The applicant has been arrested. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that it is further submitted that nobody seen the incident and only on the weak type of circumstantial evidences the entire case is made out and there is no motive and intention proved by the prosecution in the entire chart sheet. Moreover, FSL and MLC is also not supporting the prosecution. The applicant is in jail since 09.10.2024, therefore he prays that the applicant be enlarged on bail. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary produced by the learned counsel for the State. 5. Learned counsel for the State however opposes the bail application. 6. Considering the nature and gravity of the o昀昀ence and further considering the fact that the present applicant abducted the deceased who was 10 years old and committed murder and considering the seriousness of the accusations, the manner in which the crime was committed, the gravity of the o昀昀ence punishable with severe sentence, this Court does not 昀椀nd any justi昀椀able ground to grant bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. 7. O昀케ce is directed to provide a certi昀椀ed copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti