ANAND SARUP v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, FARIDABAD, ETC.
CWP/17818/2010 · 2025-07-14
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53338 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53338 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CWP-17818-2010 Date of Decision: 14.07.2025
Anand Sarup
...Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation, Faridabad and Others ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate
for respondent No.1.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Advocate
for respondent No.3.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate submits that petitioner has already retired on attaining the age of superannuation.
2.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that he has no instructions, however, he may be granted liberty to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives.
3.
Dismissed with aforesaid liberty.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 14.07.2025 Prince Chawla
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No
PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.15 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document