Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53333 (PNJ)

SANIYA PARVEEN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/4529/2025 · 2025-05-03

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106) Saniya Parveen & another State of Punjab & others CORAM : Present: SANDEEP MOUDGIL 226 of the Constitution of India 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to 6. dated 01.05.2025 (Annexure P speaking order so passed will be supplied to the petitioners in compliance to the notification No.HOME 23.01.2025 of Punjab (Home prays for withdrawal of the present petition. remedy by way of appeal in terms of the above 03.05.2025 Sailesh IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Saniya Parveen & another Versus State of Punjab & others CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Ms.Amarjeet Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner (s). Mr.Jastej Singh, Addl.A.G., Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (Oral) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the official respondents no. 2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to 6. Learned State counsel assures the Court that the representation dated 01.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) will be decided within two days and a speaking order so passed will be supplied to the petitioners in compliance to the notification No.HOME-HM-40 40SECM/14/2025 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home-4 Branch). Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail alternate remedy by way of appeal in terms of the above 03.05.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether Reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4529-2025 (O&M) Decided on : 03.05.2025 ……Petitioner(s Versus ……Respondent(s) SANDEEP MOUDGIL Ms.Amarjeet Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner (s). Mr.Jastej Singh, Addl.A.G., Punjab. of this Court has been invoked under Article for directing the official respondents no. 2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of ures the Court that the representation 5) will be decided within two days and a speaking order so passed will be supplied to the petitioners in compliance to 40 40SECM/14/2025-2H4/63 dated issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition. e petitioners would be at liberty to avail alternate remedy by way of appeal in terms of the above-said notification. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE Yes No ……Petitioner(s) ……Respondent(s) of this Court has been invoked under Article for directing the official respondents no. 2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of ures the Court that the representation 5) will be decided within two days and a speaking order so passed will be supplied to the petitioners in compliance to 2H4/63 dated issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioners e petitioners would be at liberty to avail alternate (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) SAILESH RANJAN 2025.05.05 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document