IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44172 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1. Firoz Alam S/O Late Sajjad Alam R/O Village- Mahingaon, P.S.- Amour, District- Purnea 2. Tabrej Alam S/O Late Sajjad Alam R/O Village- Mahingaon, P.S.- Amour, District- Purnea 3. Md. Khalique S/O Late Zainuddin R/O Village- Mahingaon, P.S.- Amour, District- Purnea 4. Md. Tanweer @ Md. Tanweer Alam S/O Late Sajjad Alam R/O Village- Mahingaon, P.S.- Amour, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vivekanand Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Kishor Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/ 109/76/303(2)/352/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per F.I.R., it is alleged that all the accused persons including these petitioners armed with weapons and dabiya came at the house of the informant and abused them and also assaulted them on account of land dispute. Petitioner No. 4 is alleged to have assaulted with Dabiya on the head of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Due to land Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44172 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2025 2/2 dispute, simple marpit took place in which both the sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. He submits that petitioner No. 4 has given dabiya blow on the head of the informant causing grievous injury. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts & circumstances, the prayer of petitioners No. 1, 2 and 3 for grant of anticipatory bail is accepted. Petitioner No. 4 Md. Tanweer has caused grievous injury, hence his prayer for bail is rejected. 7. In view of the above, let the petitioners No. 1, 2 and 3 (except petitioner No. 4), in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Purnea, in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 122/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 8. This application is disposed of. Saif/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T