Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53328 (CHH)

JHUMUK SINGH KORRAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1539/2025 · 2025-05-05

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20600-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1539 of 2025 Jhumuk Singh Korram S/o Late Shri Somaru Singh Korram Aged About 52 Years Farmer, Resident Of Village - Nirtu, P. S.H. - Sipat, District - Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Mobile No. 9201026866 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - P. S.H. - Baloda, District Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Superintendent Of Police District Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Suresh Singh Bhupal S/o Late Shri Shatruhan Singh Bhupal Aged About 54 Years R/o Village - Junadih, P.S.H. - Baloda, District Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Varma and Mr. Gajendra Kumar Sahu, Advocates For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 06.05.2025 MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.05.07 10:33:17 +0530 2 1. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Varma and Mr. Gajendra Kumar Sahu, learned counsels for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Government Advocate for the respondents No.1 & 2 / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to quash the FIR No. 098/2024 Police Station House Baloda District Janjgir Champa and its filed charge sheet and proceeding of Criminal Case No. 1241/2024 State vs. Jhumuk Singh Korram pending before the learned J.M.F.C. Akaltara District Janjgir Champa C.G” 3. From perusal of the relief prayed for in the present petition, it transpires that the same is a defective one as the counsel for the petitioners has not mentioned the particulars of the FIR with respect to the offences under which it has been registered and he has only drafted a vague and sketchy prayer. 4. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today, and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 3 6. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State is present. 7. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet