1 201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10819-2013 Date of Decision:29.05.2025 AWADH BIHARI ...Petitioner Vs. THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR ...Respondents 2. CWP-26871-2013 RAM NATH ...Petitioner Vs. THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR ...Respondents 3. CWP-26874-2013 RAMA SHANKAR ...Petitioner Vs. THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR ...Respondents 4. CWP-26875-2013 ANGAD YADAV ...Petitioner Vs. THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR ...Respondents 5. CWP-26884-2013 BADLU PRASAD ...Petitioner Vs. THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: None for the petitioner(s). HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) On 11.12.2023, following order has been passed. KUMUD VERMA 2025.05.31 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh 2 “On 12.07.2022, following onder was passed:- As per office report, notice could not be issued to respondent No. 2 because its correct address was not filed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to furnish correct address of respondent No. 2. Let fresh notice be issued to respondent No. 2 for 21.02.2023, on furnishing of correct address by the counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today. A perusal of the soft copies of the case also show that the writ petitions have not been scanned by the office properly. The Registry is directed to ensure that a proper scanned soft copies of the case files are available on the DMS. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases." As per office report dated 11.12.2023, notices to respondent No. 2 (in all cases) could not be issued as correct address of respondent No. 2 not furnished. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has not been able to get the correct address of respondent No. 2 and, therefore, he seeks an adjournment. It appears that sufficient time to furnish correct address of respondent No. 2 (in all cases) has elapsed. In view of above, all the matters shall stand adjourned sine die with liberty to the petitioner (s) in respective cases to get the same listed for hearing on furnishing correct address of respondent No. 2 (in all cases) by moving necessary application (s) within a period of three months from today. It is made clear that in case, needful is not done within the stipulated period, then the instant writ petitions, qua respondent No. 2 (in all cases), shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-compliance of Court order, without any further reference to the Court. Photocopy of this order be placed on connected case files. KUMUD VERMA 2025.05.31 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh 3 Even as of now, respondents who are the contesting party, have not been served, however, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner(s). It can be safely presumed that the petitioner(s) are not interested in pursuing the present petitions. The present petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. A photocopy of the order be placed on the files of other connected cases. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 29.05.2025 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2025.05.31 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh